trap staining solution g1050 Search Results


trap staining  (Servicebio Inc)
86
Servicebio Inc trap staining
( A and B ) Gross appearance of TMJ condyles and morphological scoring based on OARSI criteria ( n = 6). ( C and D ) <t>TRAP</t> <t>staining</t> of the TMJ subchondral bone, and quantitative analysis of TRAP-positive cells per unit of bone perimeter (TRAP + /B.pm) ( n = 6). The black dashed lines denote the upper boundary of the subchondral bone. Scale bar: 50 μm. ( E and F ) Two-dimensional and 3-dimensional micro-CT images illustrating the microstructure of subchondral bone, and quantitative analysis using bone structural parameters ( n = 6). BV/TV, bone volume fraction; BS/BV, bone surface fraction; Tb.Th, trabecular thickness; Tb.Sp, trabecular separation. All data are shown as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using 2-way ANOVA with Šidák’s post hoc test. NS, not significant. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.
Trap Staining, supplied by Servicebio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/trap staining/product/Servicebio Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
trap staining - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
trap detection kit  (Servicebio Inc)
86
Servicebio Inc trap detection kit
( A and B ) Gross appearance of TMJ condyles and morphological scoring based on OARSI criteria ( n = 6). ( C and D ) <t>TRAP</t> <t>staining</t> of the TMJ subchondral bone, and quantitative analysis of TRAP-positive cells per unit of bone perimeter (TRAP + /B.pm) ( n = 6). The black dashed lines denote the upper boundary of the subchondral bone. Scale bar: 50 μm. ( E and F ) Two-dimensional and 3-dimensional micro-CT images illustrating the microstructure of subchondral bone, and quantitative analysis using bone structural parameters ( n = 6). BV/TV, bone volume fraction; BS/BV, bone surface fraction; Tb.Th, trabecular thickness; Tb.Sp, trabecular separation. All data are shown as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using 2-way ANOVA with Šidák’s post hoc test. NS, not significant. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.
Trap Detection Kit, supplied by Servicebio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/trap detection kit/product/Servicebio Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
trap detection kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
tartrateresistant acid phosphatase trap  (Servicebio Inc)
86
Servicebio Inc tartrateresistant acid phosphatase trap
Figure 3: Histomorphometry and histopathological analysis of femurs in different groups. (A) Representative micro-CT reconstruction images of femurs from the two groups. (B) Trabecular BMD measured by micro-CT bone histomorphometry analysis (n = 5 for CTL group, n = 18 for ROD group). (C) Tb.N of different groups (n = 5 for CTL group, n = 18 for ROD group). (D) BV/ TV of different groups (n = 5 for CTL group, n = 18 for ROD group). (E) Tb.Th of different groups (n = 5 for CTL group, n = 18 for ROD group). (F) Tb.Sp of different groups (n = 5 for CTL group, n = 18 for ROD group). (G) Upper: representative images of <t>TRAP</t> staining. Scale bar = 100 µm; Arrows indicate positively stained osteoclasts. Middle: IHC staining of osterix in the femur; scale bar = 20 µm. Arrows indicate regions of positive staining. Bottom: IHC staining of cathepsin K in the femur; scale bar = 20 µm. Arrows indicate regions of positive staining. (H) Positive area of TRAP staining (n = 5 per group). (I) Positive area of IHC staining of osterix (n = 5 per group). (J) Positive area of IHC staining of cathepsin K (n = 5 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P <0.05, †P <0.01, ‡P <0.001, and §P <0.0001 vs. the control group. micro-CT: Microcomputed tomography; CTL: Control; ROD: Renal osteodystrophy; SEM: Standard error of the mean; BMD: bone mineral density. Tb.N: Trabecular number; BV: Bone volume; TV: Tissue volume; Tb.Th: Trabecular thickness; Tb.Sp: Trabecular separation; TRAP: Tartrate-resistant acid <t>phosphatase;</t> IHC: Immunohistochemistry.
Tartrateresistant Acid Phosphatase Trap, supplied by Servicebio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/tartrateresistant acid phosphatase trap/product/Servicebio Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tartrateresistant acid phosphatase trap - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
trap solution  (Servicebio Inc)
86
Servicebio Inc trap solution
Figure 3: Histomorphometry and histopathological analysis of femurs in different groups. (A) Representative micro-CT reconstruction images of femurs from the two groups. (B) Trabecular BMD measured by micro-CT bone histomorphometry analysis (n = 5 for CTL group, n = 18 for ROD group). (C) Tb.N of different groups (n = 5 for CTL group, n = 18 for ROD group). (D) BV/ TV of different groups (n = 5 for CTL group, n = 18 for ROD group). (E) Tb.Th of different groups (n = 5 for CTL group, n = 18 for ROD group). (F) Tb.Sp of different groups (n = 5 for CTL group, n = 18 for ROD group). (G) Upper: representative images of <t>TRAP</t> staining. Scale bar = 100 µm; Arrows indicate positively stained osteoclasts. Middle: IHC staining of osterix in the femur; scale bar = 20 µm. Arrows indicate regions of positive staining. Bottom: IHC staining of cathepsin K in the femur; scale bar = 20 µm. Arrows indicate regions of positive staining. (H) Positive area of TRAP staining (n = 5 per group). (I) Positive area of IHC staining of osterix (n = 5 per group). (J) Positive area of IHC staining of cathepsin K (n = 5 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P <0.05, †P <0.01, ‡P <0.001, and §P <0.0001 vs. the control group. micro-CT: Microcomputed tomography; CTL: Control; ROD: Renal osteodystrophy; SEM: Standard error of the mean; BMD: bone mineral density. Tb.N: Trabecular number; BV: Bone volume; TV: Tissue volume; Tb.Th: Trabecular thickness; Tb.Sp: Trabecular separation; TRAP: Tartrate-resistant acid <t>phosphatase;</t> IHC: Immunohistochemistry.
Trap Solution, supplied by Servicebio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/trap solution/product/Servicebio Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
trap solution - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
tracp staining kit  (Servicebio Inc)
86
Servicebio Inc tracp staining kit
Figure 3: Histomorphometry and histopathological analysis of femurs in different groups. (A) Representative micro-CT reconstruction images of femurs from the two groups. (B) Trabecular BMD measured by micro-CT bone histomorphometry analysis (n = 5 for CTL group, n = 18 for ROD group). (C) Tb.N of different groups (n = 5 for CTL group, n = 18 for ROD group). (D) BV/ TV of different groups (n = 5 for CTL group, n = 18 for ROD group). (E) Tb.Th of different groups (n = 5 for CTL group, n = 18 for ROD group). (F) Tb.Sp of different groups (n = 5 for CTL group, n = 18 for ROD group). (G) Upper: representative images of <t>TRAP</t> staining. Scale bar = 100 µm; Arrows indicate positively stained osteoclasts. Middle: IHC staining of osterix in the femur; scale bar = 20 µm. Arrows indicate regions of positive staining. Bottom: IHC staining of cathepsin K in the femur; scale bar = 20 µm. Arrows indicate regions of positive staining. (H) Positive area of TRAP staining (n = 5 per group). (I) Positive area of IHC staining of osterix (n = 5 per group). (J) Positive area of IHC staining of cathepsin K (n = 5 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P <0.05, †P <0.01, ‡P <0.001, and §P <0.0001 vs. the control group. micro-CT: Microcomputed tomography; CTL: Control; ROD: Renal osteodystrophy; SEM: Standard error of the mean; BMD: bone mineral density. Tb.N: Trabecular number; BV: Bone volume; TV: Tissue volume; Tb.Th: Trabecular thickness; Tb.Sp: Trabecular separation; TRAP: Tartrate-resistant acid <t>phosphatase;</t> IHC: Immunohistochemistry.
Tracp Staining Kit, supplied by Servicebio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/tracp staining kit/product/Servicebio Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tracp staining kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


( A and B ) Gross appearance of TMJ condyles and morphological scoring based on OARSI criteria ( n = 6). ( C and D ) TRAP staining of the TMJ subchondral bone, and quantitative analysis of TRAP-positive cells per unit of bone perimeter (TRAP + /B.pm) ( n = 6). The black dashed lines denote the upper boundary of the subchondral bone. Scale bar: 50 μm. ( E and F ) Two-dimensional and 3-dimensional micro-CT images illustrating the microstructure of subchondral bone, and quantitative analysis using bone structural parameters ( n = 6). BV/TV, bone volume fraction; BS/BV, bone surface fraction; Tb.Th, trabecular thickness; Tb.Sp, trabecular separation. All data are shown as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using 2-way ANOVA with Šidák’s post hoc test. NS, not significant. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.

Journal: JCI Insight

Article Title: Activation of SLIT2/ROBO1/LRP6 axis aggravates cartilage degradation via β -catenin signaling in TMJOA

doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.193632

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A and B ) Gross appearance of TMJ condyles and morphological scoring based on OARSI criteria ( n = 6). ( C and D ) TRAP staining of the TMJ subchondral bone, and quantitative analysis of TRAP-positive cells per unit of bone perimeter (TRAP + /B.pm) ( n = 6). The black dashed lines denote the upper boundary of the subchondral bone. Scale bar: 50 μm. ( E and F ) Two-dimensional and 3-dimensional micro-CT images illustrating the microstructure of subchondral bone, and quantitative analysis using bone structural parameters ( n = 6). BV/TV, bone volume fraction; BS/BV, bone surface fraction; Tb.Th, trabecular thickness; Tb.Sp, trabecular separation. All data are shown as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using 2-way ANOVA with Šidák’s post hoc test. NS, not significant. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.

Article Snippet: Osteoclasts were identified using TRAP staining (G1050, Servicebio).

Techniques: Staining, Micro-CT

Figure 3: Histomorphometry and histopathological analysis of femurs in different groups. (A) Representative micro-CT reconstruction images of femurs from the two groups. (B) Trabecular BMD measured by micro-CT bone histomorphometry analysis (n = 5 for CTL group, n = 18 for ROD group). (C) Tb.N of different groups (n = 5 for CTL group, n = 18 for ROD group). (D) BV/ TV of different groups (n = 5 for CTL group, n = 18 for ROD group). (E) Tb.Th of different groups (n = 5 for CTL group, n = 18 for ROD group). (F) Tb.Sp of different groups (n = 5 for CTL group, n = 18 for ROD group). (G) Upper: representative images of TRAP staining. Scale bar = 100 µm; Arrows indicate positively stained osteoclasts. Middle: IHC staining of osterix in the femur; scale bar = 20 µm. Arrows indicate regions of positive staining. Bottom: IHC staining of cathepsin K in the femur; scale bar = 20 µm. Arrows indicate regions of positive staining. (H) Positive area of TRAP staining (n = 5 per group). (I) Positive area of IHC staining of osterix (n = 5 per group). (J) Positive area of IHC staining of cathepsin K (n = 5 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P <0.05, †P <0.01, ‡P <0.001, and §P <0.0001 vs. the control group. micro-CT: Microcomputed tomography; CTL: Control; ROD: Renal osteodystrophy; SEM: Standard error of the mean; BMD: bone mineral density. Tb.N: Trabecular number; BV: Bone volume; TV: Tissue volume; Tb.Th: Trabecular thickness; Tb.Sp: Trabecular separation; TRAP: Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase; IHC: Immunohistochemistry.

Journal: Chinese Medical Journal

Article Title: Role of sphingolipid metabolism signaling in a novel mouse model of renal osteodystrophy based on transcriptomic approach

doi: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000003261

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 3: Histomorphometry and histopathological analysis of femurs in different groups. (A) Representative micro-CT reconstruction images of femurs from the two groups. (B) Trabecular BMD measured by micro-CT bone histomorphometry analysis (n = 5 for CTL group, n = 18 for ROD group). (C) Tb.N of different groups (n = 5 for CTL group, n = 18 for ROD group). (D) BV/ TV of different groups (n = 5 for CTL group, n = 18 for ROD group). (E) Tb.Th of different groups (n = 5 for CTL group, n = 18 for ROD group). (F) Tb.Sp of different groups (n = 5 for CTL group, n = 18 for ROD group). (G) Upper: representative images of TRAP staining. Scale bar = 100 µm; Arrows indicate positively stained osteoclasts. Middle: IHC staining of osterix in the femur; scale bar = 20 µm. Arrows indicate regions of positive staining. Bottom: IHC staining of cathepsin K in the femur; scale bar = 20 µm. Arrows indicate regions of positive staining. (H) Positive area of TRAP staining (n = 5 per group). (I) Positive area of IHC staining of osterix (n = 5 per group). (J) Positive area of IHC staining of cathepsin K (n = 5 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P <0.05, †P <0.01, ‡P <0.001, and §P <0.0001 vs. the control group. micro-CT: Microcomputed tomography; CTL: Control; ROD: Renal osteodystrophy; SEM: Standard error of the mean; BMD: bone mineral density. Tb.N: Trabecular number; BV: Bone volume; TV: Tissue volume; Tb.Th: Trabecular thickness; Tb.Sp: Trabecular separation; TRAP: Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase; IHC: Immunohistochemistry.

Article Snippet: Staining with tartrateresistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) (G1050, Servicebio) was executed in accordance with the instructions.

Techniques: Micro-CT, Staining, Immunohistochemistry, Control, Tomography